<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T U-verse HD Free Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freepreview.tv/hd-programming/att-u-verse-hd-free-preview.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freepreview.tv/hd-programming/att-u-verse-hd-free-preview.html</link>
	<description>Updated TV Free Preview Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom_C</title>
		<link>http://www.freepreview.tv/hd-programming/att-u-verse-hd-free-preview.html/comment-page-1#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom_C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 03:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freepreview.tv/?p=287#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>Last year AT&amp;T had a U450 preview which included the HD channels.  During that preview I noticed that quality of the HD On-Demand premium channels was particularly hideous.  Freezing, pixilating, etc.

I think it&#039;s pretty amusing that AT&amp;T has solved this issue for the current HD preview by not allowing us to see the HD versions of On-Demand channels to which we&#039;re already subscribed.  We have U300.  Yet they do not allow us to access Starz, Encore and Showtime HD On-Demand channels.  Even though we have the standard def versions.

My sense is that they don&#039;t want us to see that the quality has not improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year AT&amp;T had a U450 preview which included the HD channels.  During that preview I noticed that quality of the HD On-Demand premium channels was particularly hideous.  Freezing, pixilating, etc.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty amusing that AT&amp;T has solved this issue for the current HD preview by not allowing us to see the HD versions of On-Demand channels to which we&#8217;re already subscribed.  We have U300.  Yet they do not allow us to access Starz, Encore and Showtime HD On-Demand channels.  Even though we have the standard def versions.</p>
<p>My sense is that they don&#8217;t want us to see that the quality has not improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.freepreview.tv/hd-programming/att-u-verse-hd-free-preview.html/comment-page-1#comment-2356</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 02:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freepreview.tv/?p=287#comment-2356</guid>
		<description>Why does the picture on the HD channel look the same as on the regular channel?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the picture on the HD channel look the same as on the regular channel?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.freepreview.tv/hd-programming/att-u-verse-hd-free-preview.html/comment-page-1#comment-1611</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freepreview.tv/?p=287#comment-1611</guid>
		<description>What time does the free HD actually begin?

Here it is Monday and my HDTV is not showing the HD channel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What time does the free HD actually begin?</p>
<p>Here it is Monday and my HDTV is not showing the HD channel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

